*The following is in response to comments made by “Anonymous” on the post entitled, “The Guard is Always Right.”
In equating myself, a prisoner, with the status of a client, I was using the context of the latter term’s primary denotation – one for whom professional services are rendered.
Perhaps an element of your surprisingly emotional diatribe of a response was due to the fact that I (mistakenly) did not make note of the other client of the prison system, that is, society. A distinct service is rendered to both collectives (prisoners and society) and the latter (unjustly, in my opinion) subsidizes the services to the former.
You stated that I’m a burden to society because of my past actions, and thus have no individual rights; am little more than a “stored item”, and deserve to be treated poorly.
Realize that the premise of this (still flawed) argument presupposes my guilt, and that I’ve either learned nothing from my past mistakes or that any subsequent learning was worthless. Of course, such begs the question of how you could possibly know these things. If your answer is that it’s because I’m in prison—which is a distinct possibility, given that you paint with such broad strokes—then I’ll point out the logical fallacy of such circuitous reasoning.
Lastly, Anonymous, please understand my motive for writing: I simply want to unearth distinctions and create new knowledge. (The distinction of the post in question being the conceptually distinguishing element that a correctional officer’s job entails relative to all other jobs). If I can succeed at this goal, according to the standards that I have, I’ll no longer be a burden to society, whether I’m still in prison or not.
PS – Anonymous #2 and Sally, thanks for defending what’s right and proper.
Tuesday, June 30, 2009
Allow Me to Clarify
Posted by
Texas Inmate
at
Tuesday, June 30, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

Stumble It!
2 comments:
I reread your "The guard is always right" post. I felt what you were trying to convey in the post was that the guard by nature of his position had absolute control over the inmate (client). Unlike McDonald's who has something to lose, if they treat their customers poorly; guards have nothing to loose by mistreating (disrespecting) inmates. McDonald's very existence depends on having happy customers. Their attitude towards their customers is "the customer is king".
Guards on the other hand have complete power over their inmates (clients). An inmate has to be their customer no matter what, and they have to buy (into) whatever the guard commands. The problem is that where there is much power, their should be much responsibility. Power should not be used to merely for the sake of control, for displaced aggression, or for the building up of a poor self-esteem. Power should be used wisely to protect, to lead, to serve.
Guards walk a fine line between protecting the prisoners, the public, and themselves. Yet it is easy, when one has so much control, to cross over the line to abuse of power, flawed attitudes towards prisoners, and self-gratifying bullying and manipulation of inmates.
At this point it becomes a human rights issue. A prisoner may have lost many rights, but there are some rights that a guard should always be mindful of-basic human rights. When these are abused by a guard, now the guard becomes the criminal (although not behind bars). Many who are not behind bars are criminals.
We have all sinned and come short of the glory of God (guards and prisoners alike). Yet God continues to let the rain fall on both the just and the unjust. He is a merciful God, who came to set men free (from themselves). Society may have shelved the prisoner (whether justly or unjustly), but God came to set them free (whether behind bars and released from bars). God is not in the shelving business, He is in the changing business, and He will stop at nothing to change us into what he created us to be-in fellowship with Him.
I think God helps those who help themselves, I am not sure He intervenes in the affairs of men. That would be presumptuous as we still have our existence here in the world of free will choice. Agree? If so, than prison life will be whatever the "client" makes it to be for himself, with or without the interference of those who are choosing distinctly different experiences there, including the guards. It's all in the mind as some would say. I think Prison Proxy is the best example for this.
Post a Comment